TVs: cheap vs expensive - which is better
Let us immediately determine that in the comparison "TVs are cheap vs expensive", we will talk about technology, which, under all currents of circumstances, is made in China. That is, the comparison will affect brands, not the country where the plant is located. Accordingly, the phrase "Chinese TV" is rather vague, since even everyone's favorite iPhone is assembled in China. And yet, yes, it falls under the definition of "Chinese".
TVs: cheap vs expensive - prequel
The problem with choosing a TV for home constantly haunts the entire TeraNews project team. Relatives, friends, acquaintances and, in general, strangers, consider it their duty to ask: "Which TV is better to buy." And, having heard the answer, they still act in their own way. Since the answer does not satisfy anyone. And after a year or two, people are angry with our team. The reason is simple - we are to blame for not insisting on our opinion and not forcing us to do the right thing.
Expensive or cheap TV - what are we talking about
Definitely, a cheap TV is more profitable in price, since it costs 2-3 times cheaper than its counterpart from a famous brand. And, as the sellers of these cheap products claim, the buyer pays for the filling, not the brand.
If you do not delve into technology, then such statements look plausible. The TV produces a picture, plays the necessary files, and understands broadcasting. But, it is important, it costs less. Moreover, the price is so miserable that 100% of potential buyers have no doubts that expensive models are overpriced simply because of the brand.
But let's get back to reality. Let's immediately discard brands that really increase the price of products simply because of their name. These are Bang & Olufsen, Sony, Toshiba, Panasonic, JVC, Onkyo, Hitachi. Note that the majority are Japanese brands that offer mid-range appliances in the market and overpriced. Given the technical characteristics of the TVs, we do not recommend purchasing them to customers. This is throwing money down the drain. Unless you have a special desire to surprise your friends or guests with a mega-expensive TV hanging on the wall. Note, defective in terms of performance.
TVs: cheap vs expensive
| TV | Cheap | Expensive |
| Price | Up to 200 $ | From 400 $ |
| Matrix | Cheap TN or IPS rejection | IPS or MVA (PVA) |
| Image quality | Disgusting | Excellent / good |
| Support for video and audio codecs | Perhaps there is | Most famous |
| Own OS and players | Perhaps there is | Definitely there |
| Lifetime | 1-2 years | 5-10 years |
| Official warranty | Up to 1 years | Up to 3 years (Samsung and LG) |
In fact, the sign says nothing. But the essence of the problem is clear. Cheap TVs are equipment for 1-2 years of operation. A normal TV of the middle segment, which is twice as expensive, will work 4-5 times longer. Naturally, already at this stage it is clearly seen that the equipment of the budget segment is simply robbing the buyer for money.
And exactly one year later, he again comes to the store for the TV. This scheme has been unchanged for 20 years. Every year people throw away cheap TVs and buy the same low-quality and short-lived goods again. Like rabbits that climb into the mouth of a boa constrictor themselves.
TVs: cheap vs expensive - which is better
We (TeraNews team) do not sell anything. The news portal simply reviews and advises buyers. Yes, we make money on our recommendations, but this is a separate item of income. TVs are interesting: cheap vs expensive - which is better? Definitely a mid-range TV. We recommend buying a TV Samsung or LG. These are the only companies in the world that make TVs from scratch. Displays, microcircuits, boards - all their own. For the buyer, these are modern technologies at an affordable price.
In order for the buyer to understand what the segment of low-quality TVs is, we recommend watching the video of the famous Ukrainian blogger. Sorry, no subtitle video. Its essence is that the blogger's grandmother bought the cheapest TV. Although her grandson suggested that she add $ 100 to take something more durable. As a result, a year later, the TV's LED backlight burned out, and the grandmother bought the same cheap one again. Along the way, explaining to her grandson that she wants to buy a cheap TV. As a result, the deceased TV is shot with buckshot from a gun. And the grandson (blogger) remains a misunderstood grandmother. By the way, the grandson is absolutely right, but it is impossible for people who watch advertisements on the screens of the same televisions to prove their case in the 21st century.